Sponsored By:
Stop stressing over weekly stock picks! Our veteran investor just released a FREE report featuring 10 U.S. stocks you can buy and hold — backed by 20+ years of experience and deep research into AI, EVs, digital health, and cloud megatrends.
Get bulletproof entries, holding strategies, portfolio allocation guides, and sector insights that work for beginners and pros alike. Available for first movers only — grab yours in the next few days!
Get the 10 Stocks For FreeBy clicking this link you agree to receive emails from StockEarnings and our affiliates. You can opt out at any time. Privacy Policy
Image via Western Journal
US Hits ISIS Again in Nigeria — Keep the Pressure, Protect the Homeland
U.S. forces reportedly struck additional ISIS targets in Nigeria just two days after eliminating a top Islamic State leader operating in the region. The follow-on hit targeted ISIS fighters and infrastructure, continuing the Trump administration’s posture of taking the fight to terror networks before they can metastasize and threaten Americans or our allies.
West Africa doesn’t get the cable-news attention that the Middle East does, but the terror franchise model is the same: weak governance, ungoverned space, and extremists using local chaos to build global capability. When these groups get breathing room, they turn that room into training camps, financing lanes, and propaganda factories—then somebody in the West pays the price.
🏛 Wade's Take: This is what “peace through strength” looks like—decisive action, quick follow-ups, and no hand-wringing while terrorists regroup. It’s also an economic issue: stable trade routes, safer energy logistics, and fewer shocks that ripple into fuel prices and inflation. If you want to protect working families and small businesses at home, you don’t let jihadists set up shop abroad.
Image via NTD
Trump Drops $10B IRS Lawsuit — Strategy, Not Surrender
President Trump has reportedly dropped a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. Details vary depending on what stage the case was in and what prompted the withdrawal, but the headline is clear: a high-profile legal fight with the tax agency is being taken off the board—for now.
In business, you don’t keep throwing attorney hours at a case just because you’re mad. You reassess: odds of winning, discovery risk, timeline, and what else you could do with the money and attention. Lawsuits aren’t morality plays—they’re capital allocation decisions with legal wrappers.
🏛 Wade's Take: Dropping a suit isn’t automatically weakness; sometimes it’s clearing the deck to fight a better battle on better terrain. The bigger issue remains: the IRS has become too powerful, too political, and too comfortable treating taxpayers like suspects. Conservatives should push for simpler taxes, tighter due-process protections, and an agency that fears oversight the way the public fears audits.
📎 NTD
Iowa Dem Skips Veterans Funding Vote — But Makes Time for a Schumer-Aligned Happy Hour
Iowa Democratic Senate hopeful Josh Turek reportedly skipped a vote tied to veterans services funding so he could attend a happy hour hosted by VoteVets, a left-wing super PAC aligned with Chuck Schumer’s political machine. That’s not a minor scheduling conflict—that’s a statement about priorities.
Veterans funding votes are the kind of thing serious candidates don’t miss, because they’re not symbolic. They tie directly to services, staffing, and programs that impact real people—often in rural communities where VA access is already a fight. Meanwhile, super PAC mixers are where politicians go to audition for donor class approval and get their talking points laminated.
🏛 Wade's Take: If you’ll skip veterans to kiss the ring of a D.C. money operation, you’re telling Iowa exactly who you plan to serve. And from an economic standpoint, this is the same attitude that wrecks trust in institutions—folks stop believing government can do basic duties, so everything gets more expensive, more bureaucratic, and less accountable. Veterans deserve better than being used as campaign garnish.
Image via The Daily Signal
New HHS Program Targets Missing Foster Kids — A Serious Move Against Trafficking
The Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services has launched a new program aimed at locating missing foster children and preventing them from being trafficked. According to reporting, the effort is designed to close gaps where kids fall off the radar—especially in systems where case loads are high and accountability is low.
This problem is bigger than politics: missing foster children are uniquely vulnerable because they often lack stable family advocates, consistent schooling, and reliable records that follow them. When the system loses a child, predators find them fast. A targeted program implies better interagency coordination, improved tracking, and a mandate to treat “missing” as an emergency—not paperwork.
🏛 Wade's Take: The first job of government is protecting the innocent, and it doesn’t get more innocent than a kid in state custody. If the state takes responsibility for a child, the state owns the outcome—period. And yes, it’s also a financial issue: fixing this upfront costs money, but ignoring it costs lives and creates generational damage that taxpayers end up funding forever.
Image via National Review
National Review Goes After Massie — A Warning Shot at the “Pure” Wing
National Review argues that Rep. Thomas Massie “deserves to lose,” painting him as a conspiracy-minded outlier and suggesting his district should retire him. The piece reflects a long-running tension inside the conservative coalition: the institutional right versus the anti-establishment right, especially when it comes to messaging discipline, foreign policy instincts, and leadership strategy.
Massie’s brand has always been: principled no-votes, deep skepticism of leadership, and a strain of libertarian populism that doesn’t fit neatly into party messaging. His supporters call it integrity; his critics call it sabotage. Either way, the fight isn’t just about one congressman—it’s about who gets to define “responsible conservatism” in the post-2024 GOP.
🏛 Wade's Take: I’m a businessman—I respect a guy who reads the bill, counts the cost, and won’t vote yes just to get invited to the cocktail party. But if you’re going to be the “no” vote, you’d better be deadly serious, fact-grounded, and strategic—because purity politics can burn time and capital we don’t have. The real test is whether a member helps conservatives win durable reforms, not just moral victories on cable.
I’m Wade Lawson — keep your eyes on Washington, your hands on your budget, and your feet on solid ground.
— Wade Lawson